Which is a better engine?

General Subaru Talk - Media / News / Stories ...
Post Reply
User avatar
nairobery
Junior Member
Posts: 50
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 10:47 pm
Location: Thika,Kenya.

Which is a better engine?

Post by nairobery » Mon Dec 16, 2013 8:35 pm

Hi yall,we are shopping for a used subaru for my wife. We got 2 good looking cars and we are torn between them, so just looking for more information before we make the big decision.

1. subaru lx 1.8 Litre engine
2. subaru ts-r 2.0 litre engine

Which is the better car/engine and why ??

Thanks.

User avatar
Gannon
Senior Member
Posts: 4580
Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 10:00 am
Location: Bowraville, Mid Nth Coast, NSW

Post by Gannon » Mon Dec 16, 2013 9:35 pm

You havent mentioned what model of car, but I will guess they are Imprezas

Both the EJ18 and EJ20 are basically the same engine, just one has slightly less capacity. In some markets the EJ18 had single point fuel injection or a carburettor as opposed to multipoint fuel injection like the EJ20, but mechanically they are the same.

The EJ20 is the pick because it has more power
Current rides: 2016 Mitsubishi Triton GLS & 2004 Forester X
Ongoing Project/Toy: 1987 RX Turbo EA82T, Speeduino ECU, Coil-pack ignition, 440cc Injectors, KONI adjustale front struts, Hybrid L Series/ Liberty AWD 5sp
Past rides: 92 L series turbo converted wagon, 83 Leone GL Sedan, 2004 Liberty GT Sedan & 2001 Outback
------------------------------------------

User avatar
nairobery
Junior Member
Posts: 50
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 10:47 pm
Location: Thika,Kenya.

Post by nairobery » Mon Dec 16, 2013 9:55 pm

They are both legacys , the lx is a 1997 model, am not very sure of the ts-r year.

Thanks for that, will definitely help in the decision we make.


Gannon wrote:You havent mentioned what model of car, but I will guess they are Imprezas

Both the EJ18 and EJ20 are basically the same engine, just one has slightly less capacity. In some markets the EJ18 had single point fuel injection or a carburettor as opposed to multipoint fuel injection like the EJ20, but mechanically they are the same.

The EJ20 is the pick because it has more power

User avatar
NachaLuva
General Member
Posts: 1930
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2011 5:05 pm
Location: SE Melbourne

Post by NachaLuva » Tue Dec 17, 2013 2:04 pm

I have a 1997 EJ20 in my Forester. Its a much heavier car than an Impreza but I find it pulls it along fine. If both cars are approx equal in condition I'd go the 2.0L.

remember to check when the timing belt has been done. It needs to be done at 100,000kms intervals. At that age prob nearing 200,000kms so will also need water pump, cam/crank seals. Dont ignore the timing belt, if it goes, the pistons smash into the valves up to 100x per sec....pretty good way to write off an engine lol.

This can be used as a bargaining point to bring the price down ;)
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Owner SubieLiftOz, lift kits for Subarus :twisted:

'97 Forester: EJ22E; 4" Custom Body Lift; JDM STi plated LSD; 20mm WRX RSB; Snorkel; Kings

User avatar
nairobery
Junior Member
Posts: 50
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 10:47 pm
Location: Thika,Kenya.

Post by nairobery » Tue Dec 17, 2013 5:43 pm

This is great info, I did not know about the timing belt check, it will be one of the 1st things i ask about the cars, and am sure it will help bring the price down.

Am also leaning towards the 2.0L just because it might have slightly more power.

Thanks :D
NachaLuva wrote:I have a 1997 EJ20 in my Forester. Its a much heavier car than an Impreza but I find it pulls it along fine. If both cars are approx equal in condition I'd go the 2.0L.

remember to check when the timing belt has been done. It needs to be done at 100,000kms intervals. At that age prob nearing 200,000kms so will also need water pump, cam/crank seals. Dont ignore the timing belt, if it goes, the pistons smash into the valves up to 100x per sec....pretty good way to write off an engine lol.

This can be used as a bargaining point to bring the price down ;)

User avatar
El_Freddo
Master Member
Posts: 12637
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 10:00 am
Location: Bridgewater Vic
Contact:

Post by El_Freddo » Thu Dec 19, 2013 12:41 pm

If I had an option between the EJ18 or EJ20 I'd be going the EJ20 -> That's sometimes an Aussie thing...

What can happen with the smaller engine is that you can use more fuel due to the smaller (and less powerful engine) having to work harder generally with higher revs. There is a limit of course, go too big and it will naturally drink more even with conservative driving techniques.

The EJ20 is my pic!

Cheers

Bennie
"The lounge room is not a workshop..."
Image
El Freddo's Pics - El_Freddo's youtube

User avatar
nairobery
Junior Member
Posts: 50
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 10:47 pm
Location: Thika,Kenya.

Post by nairobery » Thu Dec 19, 2013 7:26 pm

Hi Bennie,

We actually got the EJ20 i will post pics later. i also read somewhere that the ej18 might consume more, which is true from your comment.

Thanks yall , i guess i made the right decision.

Cheers:D


El_Freddo wrote:If I had an option between the EJ18 or EJ20 I'd be going the EJ20 -> That's sometimes an Aussie thing...

What can happen with the smaller engine is that you can use more fuel due to the smaller (and less powerful engine) having to work harder generally with higher revs. There is a limit of course, go too big and it will naturally drink more even with conservative driving techniques.

The EJ20 is my pic!

Cheers

Bennie

User avatar
RSR 555
Elder Member
Posts: 6951
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2007 10:42 am
Location: ATM... stuck in Rockingham

Post by RSR 555 » Fri Dec 20, 2013 2:03 am

The LX 1.8 would probably have been a 2WD car. The TS-R 2.0 is a AWD model, so the economy may have been very similar. I would have also picked the TS-R as this is a higher spec model and has a lot more features.

We need pics :)
You know you are getting old when the candles on your birthday cake start to cost more than the cake itself.

RSR Performance
Home of the 'MURTAYA' in Oz
Subaru Impreza WRX based Sportscar
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

Disclaimer: Not my website but hyperlink here to Subaru workshop manuals

User avatar
nairobery
Junior Member
Posts: 50
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 10:47 pm
Location: Thika,Kenya.

Post by nairobery » Sun Dec 22, 2013 4:05 pm

[ATTACH]4325[/ATTACH][ATTACH]4326[/ATTACH][ATTACH]4327[/ATTACH][ATTACH]4328[/ATTACH]

Sent from my HTC PH39100 using Tapatalk 2
Attachments
uploadfromtaptalk1387692308709.jpg
uploadfromtaptalk1387692308709.jpg (55.71 KiB) Viewed 2224 times
uploadfromtaptalk1387692281527.jpg
uploadfromtaptalk1387692281527.jpg (51.25 KiB) Viewed 2225 times
uploadfromtaptalk1387692269071.jpg
uploadfromtaptalk1387692269071.jpg (42.27 KiB) Viewed 2223 times
uploadfromtaptalk1387692233965.jpg
uploadfromtaptalk1387692233965.jpg (53.3 KiB) Viewed 2222 times

User avatar
nairobery
Junior Member
Posts: 50
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2012 10:47 pm
Location: Thika,Kenya.

Post by nairobery » Sun Dec 22, 2013 5:09 pm

[ATTACH]4330[/ATTACH][ATTACH]4331[/ATTACH][ATTACH]4332[/ATTACH][ATTACH]4333[/ATTACH]

Sent from my HTC PH39100 using Tapatalk 2
Attachments
uploadfromtaptalk1387696187794.jpg
uploadfromtaptalk1387696187794.jpg (64.37 KiB) Viewed 2220 times
uploadfromtaptalk1387696175960.jpg
uploadfromtaptalk1387696175960.jpg (60.17 KiB) Viewed 2220 times
uploadfromtaptalk1387696161365.jpg
uploadfromtaptalk1387696161365.jpg (63.36 KiB) Viewed 2221 times
uploadfromtaptalk1387696146780.jpg
uploadfromtaptalk1387696146780.jpg (58.68 KiB) Viewed 2221 times

User avatar
RSR 555
Elder Member
Posts: 6951
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2007 10:42 am
Location: ATM... stuck in Rockingham

Post by RSR 555 » Sat Dec 28, 2013 12:52 pm

Nice choice.. looks great. 2.0 ltr quad cam non turbo :cool:
You know you are getting old when the candles on your birthday cake start to cost more than the cake itself.

RSR Performance
Home of the 'MURTAYA' in Oz
Subaru Impreza WRX based Sportscar
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

Disclaimer: Not my website but hyperlink here to Subaru workshop manuals

Post Reply

Return to “Subaru Chat”