that 195/70R-14 will clear the front fenders with about 1cm gap as the edge of the tyre swings around the fender.
It looks like a great fit. But I'm also curious if a 205/65R-14 (if that exists?) might be even better. It's 0.25" diameter shorter, so that could mean the car sits 0.125" lower (3mm) but it would also be slightly better floatation, possibly being equal or taller than the 195/70R-14 when it's aired down to 15psi for beach driving. Then I'm reminded that 205/65R-14 with its bigger footprint would take more power to get rolling when it isn't aired down. If 205/65R-14's are also heavier than the 195/70R-14's, that would be another downside.
If I had a strong motor, the choice would be easy;
cut off the mud flaps and put on at least 215/65R-14's.

But my motor is a bit lacking, even slowish to rev with the engine in neutral.
My fuel economy is also around 10.5L/100km, last time I checked.
It'd probably go over 12L/100km with this motor on 215's.
I'll want new tyres in the next 5,000 or so kilometres.
I think I need bigger tyres since at the Preston Beach gathering,
my car hit a big piece of driftwood, probably bouncing off the bash plate, but Dan's L Series driving the same track didn't.
His L Series has 1" more lift, plus 195/70R-14's, so about 1.5" higher ride height.
I weighed my spare 195/70R-14 on Sunraysias with a luggage scale and it came out 40lbs or 18kg.
I weighed my nearly-bald 185/70R-14's also on Sunraysias and it came out 33lbs or 15kg.
That's quite a big difference, though my spare has large, deep, chunky, all-terrainish tread.
My suspicion is until I get a more powerful motor,
a tyre tread pattern meant for low rolling resistance might be the best way to go,
with the condition that I might like to visit Karijini NP in NW Oz.
People go there in cars, so my Subi should be better,
but I don't want to get a tyre that has very low toughness to prevent a blowout.
I have pictures of the 195's on my car that I might load later, if that'd help.
Thoughts?