I got a set made up - a dodgy way looking back on it - I would definitely make them a little differently if I was to play with the EA's again. They were also super painful to set to the gap of 7th of a mm or whatever it was that the EA81 runs on its rocker arm clearance.nncoolg wrote:what ended up happening with this?...
The MPFI wasn't anything special under 4000 rpm but after that it took off harder than I'd experienced before.
What ended up happening was halfway to perth one shagged out almost resulting in a dropped valve (luckily this didn't happen) so a roadside swap back to the hydraulic lifters was done as well as replacing the half moon valve retaining clip, it almost ended up in the sump! After this swap I've never really thought about them again...
Yeah I did! And there's no need to be quiet about it either - the EJ goes loads better than a fresh EA ever did - best bit I often forget about is the noisy lifter issue I used to be so frustrated by!steptoe wrote:shh, think Bennie went EJ !!
Yeah probably correct, but with the solid lifters and the MPFI it went OK - dad's mate whom I got the idea from had a carbie EA82 that would have been sucking fuel for the entire duration unlike the MPFI system that would only be squirting for a short time as programmed. His carb'd EA82 went hard.littlewhiteute wrote:Sorry to disappoint, but hydraulic cams are ground differently to solid cams.
Running a solid adjustable lash adjuster on a hydraulic camshaft will wear out the camshaft and be noisy, a noise you won't get rid of.
The opening ramp will take up all the clearance way too fast.
So, if you want solid lash adjusters, the cams need to be reground as a solid profile.
And the noise was much better than even one noisy lifter - its like a slight chatter that reminds you that you're running solid lifters. Nothing to worry about. I would liken it to a mini's engine chatter, same sort of thing.
I didn't care about cam wear - who does??
Cheers
Bennie