First one to identify this, wins.....
Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 6:47 pm
A free EA82 part of their choice from my shed (subarooster is not included in this competition)
Hint.... its an OEM part
Hint.... its an OEM part
The AUSubaru.com.au Forums
One of Australia's original and top performing Subaru sites. Come and have a look and find out why so many people enjoy this site.***ONLINE SINCE SEPTEMBER 2018*** site address: www.ausubaru.com.au
https://ausubaru.com.au/
First one to identify this, wins.....
Page 1 of 2
Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 6:51 pm
haha aww
Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 6:52 pm
food processor? 
Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 7:10 pm
im going to state the obvious and say exhaust manifold, with turbo and cat.
possibly from a new legacy
possibly from a new legacy
re: identify this
Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 8:12 pm
is it exhaust manafolt and turbo from new diesel subaru,
Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 8:20 pm
it is a twinscrol turbo set up.
what it is off i do not know as it is a bit late in the subaru on the market as i do not see them .
what it is off i do not know as it is a bit late in the subaru on the market as i do not see them .
Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 8:32 pm
its a exhaust manifold and turbo fromm the new subi diesel engine.
Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 9:32 pm
it cant be from diesel.....
Cheers
AP
Cheers
AP
Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 9:34 pm
Isnt that from 2010 Liberty/Legacy turbo?
Cheers
AP
Cheers
AP
Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 9:38 pm
uhu
/10char
/10char
Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 9:43 pm
its wacky hey. Here's a pic of how it looks on the engine with the turbo there...
I'll definitely need a really good bash plate when I put one of these motors in my wagon
I'll definitely need a really good bash plate when I put one of these motors in my wagon
Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 9:52 pm
chuckles....
YEah nice looking engine and its completely different.. At first I thought it would've been triple turbo but nah... I knew it wouldnt be diesel because ive already seen the diesel engine and it doesnt have that thing on exhaust.
Cheers
AP
YEah nice looking engine and its completely different.. At first I thought it would've been triple turbo but nah... I knew it wouldnt be diesel because ive already seen the diesel engine and it doesnt have that thing on exhaust.
Cheers
AP
Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:07 pm
Fats had it first.
AP was on the right track and Andrew hit the nail on the head
Yeah its the 2010 Legacy B4, strangely its not a twin scroll.
Power figures of 210Kw and 350Nm between 2000rpm and nearly 5000rpm
AP was on the right track and Andrew hit the nail on the head
Yeah its the 2010 Legacy B4, strangely its not a twin scroll.
Power figures of 210Kw and 350Nm between 2000rpm and nearly 5000rpm
Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:17 pm
*winks with a grin*Suparoo wrote:Fats had it first.
AP was on the right track and Andrew hit the nail on the head
Yeah its the 2010 Legacy B4, strangely its not a twin scroll.
Power figures of 210Kw and 350Nm between 2000rpm and nearly 5000rpm
Nice nice...
Cheers
AP
Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 11:51 pm
i may be wrong with deisel, mandrel bent exhaust maybe an sti part?
Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 11:54 pm
replied again before rest of page came up.sorry
Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 10:56 am
Interesting that it's not twin scroll , would be very easy with a suitable turbine housing to make it TS .
One engineering prob to solve with a low mounted turbocharger is it's oil return to the sump as oil won't gravity feed sideways or uphill , frothy oil foam ex turbo anyway .
One thing that's always been an issue for Subaru flat engines , turbo anyway , was the unequal length header pipes - and the dodgy method of only having one pipe from each heads pair of exhaust ports .
Aside from better developed combustion chambers and porting this aspect ain't a lot better than an EA82T - granted the 82T's header junctions are a lot worse .
What they got was the wrong pairing of cylinders given their firing order .
When you do it like that exhaust gas scavenging isn't real good and to a degree performance and fuel consumption will suffer .
Subaru's never seem to have been class winners when it comes to fuel consumption and I'd say Fuji can't afford to ignore this any longer .
To get the exhausts engine pipes close to the same length I suppose the turbo had to go forward because it'd be too low under and behind the engine and nowhere to put it above . Going forward and low is all you can really do on a flat four to make the packaging work .
I guess the rub is that being where it is will be an issue if you hit something hard enough because it may well spear it back into the sump , along with that front mount looking thing .
Cheers A .
One engineering prob to solve with a low mounted turbocharger is it's oil return to the sump as oil won't gravity feed sideways or uphill , frothy oil foam ex turbo anyway .
One thing that's always been an issue for Subaru flat engines , turbo anyway , was the unequal length header pipes - and the dodgy method of only having one pipe from each heads pair of exhaust ports .
Aside from better developed combustion chambers and porting this aspect ain't a lot better than an EA82T - granted the 82T's header junctions are a lot worse .
What they got was the wrong pairing of cylinders given their firing order .
When you do it like that exhaust gas scavenging isn't real good and to a degree performance and fuel consumption will suffer .
Subaru's never seem to have been class winners when it comes to fuel consumption and I'd say Fuji can't afford to ignore this any longer .
To get the exhausts engine pipes close to the same length I suppose the turbo had to go forward because it'd be too low under and behind the engine and nowhere to put it above . Going forward and low is all you can really do on a flat four to make the packaging work .
I guess the rub is that being where it is will be an issue if you hit something hard enough because it may well spear it back into the sump , along with that front mount looking thing .
Cheers A .
Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 5:39 pm
It's not gunna like water crossings either...
Daza
Daza
Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 5:49 pm
heh I really had no idea at all, I just searched google for a couple of minutes based on the filename of the jpg image you posted and found a forum thread about it with a few extra pics
Posted: Tue Jul 07, 2009 7:31 pm
You sneaky buggerAndrewT wrote:I just searched google for a couple of minutes based on the filename of the jpg
