Page 1 of 2

Real Forrester Ute

Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2009 7:25 pm
by ChPLAT
Looking around on trademe.co.nz came across this.

http://www.trademe.co.nz/Trade-Me-Motor ... 412324.htm

Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2009 8:32 pm
by AlpineRaven
gee.. but looks good but why would they do that!?
Cheers
AP

Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 7:20 am
by dfoyl
Nice bodywork but looks out of balance - even worse than the US Baja's...

Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 8:51 am
by brumbyrunner
I actually like it.....

Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 9:16 am
by Alex
love it. ALOT!

Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 9:24 am
by preno
Eww. Could hardly fit a swag + esky in the back of that thing.

I reckon a single cab version would be a lot better

Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 9:49 am
by last celtic warrior
Look closely at the metalwork in the tub area. I personally wouldn't like to find out how much bog is in that job. And cutting the back of the roof off and rear pillars, then zapping on a rear window section, being a "non structural" modification? Seems to me this "cert shop" he mentions in a reply to someone's question about certification is most likely just the local fish'n'chip shop...

Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 10:46 am
by El_Freddo
last celtic warrior wrote:Seems to me this "cert shop" he mentions in a reply to someone's question about certification is most likely just the local fish'n'chip shop...
Don't you mean a "fush and chup" shop? :p

I don't mind it, being a little partical to the brumby I reckon it'd look better as a two door with the longer driver's and passenger's door and more "ute space".
One thing that concerns me with the ute tub in this is that it has not had the side panel access areas sealed - a good spot for dust + water to enter equalling rust...

I would love to see subaru do another ute, maybe not as luxurious as their other models but a 2 door (and maybe) a 4 door ute would be the go..

Cheers

Bennie

Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 11:07 am
by Phizinza
Problem with Subau building a ute is it would have no load carrying abilities and wouldn't sell. Back in the day of the Brumby's no one cared about over loading. These days theres a $10000 or so fine for over loading and a 350kg limit is pretty stupid.

Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 11:15 am
by El_Freddo
Phizinza wrote:350kg limit is pretty stupid.
Isn't that what the commodore utes with independant suspension is limited to carrying?!

Bennie

Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 11:25 am
by Phizinza
SS VE payload = 618kg
SV6 VE payload = 650kg
Omega VE payload = 794kg

From Redbook.com.au

Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 11:29 am
by Bumpty
Front view is alright, the tub is horrid. Needs a longer (flat) tray or to be a 2 door.

So we've had the cut down forrie and the shortened L, what else will these crazy NZers do next (what ever it is, I look forward to it)

Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 11:33 am
by El_Freddo
Phizinza wrote:SS VE payload = 618kg
SV6 VE payload = 650kg
Omega VE payload = 794kg

From Redbook.com.au
I was thinkin about the VT-VY utes...
Bumpty wrote:Front view is alright, the tub is horrid. Needs a longer (flat) tray or to be a 2 door.

So we've had the cut down forrie and the shortened L, what else will these crazy NZers do next (what ever it is, I look forward to it)
Weld one subi up-side down to another so if you roll it you haven't really got a problem!?

My first thoughts anyway.

Cheers

Bennie

Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 11:54 am
by Phizinza
VY payload = 780kg
VS payload = 710kg

I have no idea about holdens (and wish to keep it that way) but these are the figures I can find and they look like decent payloads for unibody cars. Maybe, just maybe, subaru could make a stronger heavier body for the ute and then put a larger motor in. Like run the EZ36 in a Forester ute?

Posted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 9:09 am
by Willie
preno wrote:Eww. Could hardly fit a swag + esky in the back of that thing.

I reckon a single cab version would be a lot better
There's a single cab version getting around Darwin. I didn't like it too much, as the cab looked too short, with little adjustment for the seats. It needed longer doors and a slightly longer cab to look the goods. But a great idea for Subaru - a new age Brumby????

Posted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 9:34 am
by Phizinza
Willie wrote:It needed longer doors and a slightly longer cab to look the goods.
Like this?
Image

Posted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 11:52 am
by daveosubi
El Freddo , I think your referring to the showpony performance utes like the hsv maloo and fpv ones. Some of them are only around 350-450 kg's, i think the fords carry a bit more than the holdens but not much. Id love to throw a ladder in one and scratch the metallic duco or the armor all'd never been used before plactic tray liner :)

Posted: Tue Feb 10, 2009 2:39 pm
by dibs
wheres that one from pizanza its left hand drive . id have one of them

dibs

Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2009 9:59 pm
by last celtic warrior
It's a photoshop job Dibs... Try this touched up version.

Image

Posted: Thu Feb 12, 2009 10:04 pm
by subarooster
mmm... i would perhaps own one but that nz one is nothing like a new age brat. try taking that offroad, first rut and the tub would twist off the cab in a motion that resembles that of a rubic's cube. :)